Endoscopic Versus Open Resection for Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Endoscopic resection has been performed to treat small gastric neoplasms. However, this technique for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) remains controversial. This study aims to compare the safety and surgical outcomes of endoscopic versus open resection of small gastric GISTs.The medical records of 54 consecutive gastric GISTs patients with tumor size of ≤2 cm, who were surgically treated with endoscopic resection (endoscopic group) or open surgery (laparotomy group) in a single institution from March 2010 to June 2014, were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical and tumor characteristics, surgical safety, and tumor-related outcomes were evaluated.Of 54 patients, 32 and 22 patients underwent endoscopic resection and laparotomy, respectively. Patients who underwent endoscopic resection yielded a significantly shorter hospital stay compared with patients who underwent laparotomy (P < 0.001). Compared with patients in the endoscopic group, patients in the laparotomy group had more intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001), had longer nasogastric tube retention (P < 0.001), and required longer operative time (P < 0.001). More laparotomy patients required postoperative analgesic drugs than those in the endoscopic group (n = 9 vs 4; P = 0.016). Gastric perforation occurred in 1 case during operation in the endoscopic group. Patients who underwent these 2 procedures did not differ with respect to tumor size (P = 0.168), perioperative transfusion (P = 1.000), reoperation (P = 1.000), early satiety (P = 0.560), and postoperative bleeding (P = 1.000). With a median follow-up time of 34.5 months, 1 high-risk patient in each group experienced tumor recurrence/metastasis postoperatively.The endoscopic procedure allows safe resection with good surgical outcomes for small gastric GISTs compared with laparotomy. Moreover, larger randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm endoscopic application for small gastric GISTs.